Results for “New York (State). Court of Appeals

651 books found

Books

John A.C. Gray, appellant, against the Manhattan Railway Co., et al., respondents

John A.C. Gray, appellant, against the Manhattan Railway Co., et al., respondents

J. A. C. Gray

1890

Revised rules of the Court of appeals of the state of New York for the admission of attorneys and counsellors-at-law proposed by the Joint conference on legal education in the state of New York

Revised rules of the Court of appeals of the state of New York for the admission of attorneys and counsellors-at-law proposed by the Joint conference on legal education in the state of New York

New York (State). Court of Appeals.

1954

In the Court of Appeals, Sophie E. Minton, respondent, vs. the New York Elevated Railroad Co., et al., appellants, no. 462

In the Court of Appeals, Sophie E. Minton, respondent, vs. the New York Elevated Railroad Co., et al., appellants, no. 462

Sophie E. Minton

1890

In the Court of Appeals, Lena Pappenheim, plaintiff and respondent, against the Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company et al., defendants and appellants

In the Court of Appeals, Lena Pappenheim, plaintiff and respondent, against the Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company et al., defendants and appellants

Lena Pappenheim

1891

In the Court of Appeals, state of New York, Anna Maria Doyle, plaintiff and respondent, against the Manhattan Railway Company and the Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company, defendants and appellants

In the Court of Appeals, state of New York, Anna Maria Doyle, plaintiff and respondent, against the Manhattan Railway Company and the Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company, defendants and appellants

Anna Maria Doyle

1891

In the Court of Appeals, state of New York, Thomas K. Foster, plaintiff and respondent, against the New York Elevated Railroad Company and the Manhattan Railway Company, defendants and appellants

In the Court of Appeals, state of New York, Thomas K. Foster, plaintiff and respondent, against the New York Elevated Railroad Company and the Manhattan Railway Company, defendants and appellants

Thomas K. Foster

1804

In the Court of Appeals, James Horner and James Ludlum, respondents, against David H. Lyman and Richard L. Allen, appellants

In the Court of Appeals, James Horner and James Ludlum, respondents, against David H. Lyman and Richard L. Allen, appellants

David H. Lyman

1860

State of New York, in the Court of Appeals, Ann Parish and Martha Sherman, appellants, against Susan M. Parish, Joseph Delafield, Daniel Parish and James Parish, respondants

State of New York, in the Court of Appeals, Ann Parish and Martha Sherman, appellants, against Susan M. Parish, Joseph Delafield, Daniel Parish and James Parish, respondants

James Parish

1857

In the Court of Appeals, state of New York, Abraham Salomon, plaintiff-respondent, against the Manhattan Railway Company, the New York Elevated Railroad Company, and the Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company, defendants and appellants

In the Court of Appeals, state of New York, Abraham Salomon, plaintiff-respondent, against the Manhattan Railway Company, the New York Elevated Railroad Company, and the Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company, defendants and appellants

Abraham Salomon

1891

In the matter of United Press Associations et al., appellants, against Francis L. Valente, individually and as judge of the Court of General Sessions of the County of New York, respondent

In the matter of United Press Associations et al., appellants, against Francis L. Valente, individually and as judge of the Court of General Sessions of the County of New York, respondent

Francis L. Valente

1955

The record in the United States Supreme Court on the basis of which the conviction of Benjamin Gitlow ... was affirmed ...

The record in the United States Supreme Court on the basis of which the conviction of Benjamin Gitlow ... was affirmed ...

Gitlow, Benjamin

1953

In the Court of Appeals, William Lewis Boyle, plaintiff-appellant, against Staten Island and South Beach Land Company, Limited, defendant-respondent

In the Court of Appeals, William Lewis Boyle, plaintiff-appellant, against Staten Island and South Beach Land Company, Limited, defendant-respondent

William Lewis Boyle

1900

Brief in support of defendants-respondents by amici curiae

Brief in support of defendants-respondents by amici curiae

Robert M. Byrn

1972

In the Court of Appeals of the state of New York, in the matter of the application of the city of New York, by the Corporation Counsel, for the appointment of commissioners of Estimate and Assessment to ascertain and determine the compensation which should justly be made for the discontinuance and closing of West 151st Street, from the easterly side of Riverside Drive extension to the United States, Bulkhead Line, Hudson River, in the 12th Ward, borough of Manhattan, city of New York, damage nos. 1 and 2, matter of Higgins

In the Court of Appeals of the state of New York, in the matter of the application of the city of New York, by the Corporation Counsel, for the appointment of commissioners of Estimate and Assessment to ascertain and determine the compensation which should justly be made for the discontinuance and closing of West 151st Street, from the easterly side of Riverside Drive extension to the United States, Bulkhead Line, Hudson River, in the 12th Ward, borough of Manhattan, city of New York, damage nos. 1 and 2, matter of Higgins

Francis Higgins

1917

Dewitt C. Graham and James S. Carpentier, executors, &c., of David Graham, deceased, respondents, against Peter Chrystal, appellant, statement and points for respondents

Dewitt C. Graham and James S. Carpentier, executors, &c., of David Graham, deceased, respondents, against Peter Chrystal, appellant, statement and points for respondents

Dewitt C. Graham

1864

Piper vs. Hoard

Piper vs. Hoard

John D. Monroe

1927

George H. Tilden, respondent, against Andrew H. Green, &c., et al., appellants

George H. Tilden, respondent, against Andrew H. Green, &c., et al., appellants

Green, A. H.

1889

In the Court of Appeals, Second Division, James P. Kernochan, individually and as executor of and trustee under the will of Joseph Kernochan, deceased and others, respondents, against the New York Elevated Railroad and another, appellants

In the Court of Appeals, Second Division, James P. Kernochan, individually and as executor of and trustee under the will of Joseph Kernochan, deceased and others, respondents, against the New York Elevated Railroad and another, appellants

James P. Kernochan

1892

The Parish will case, argument of John K. Porter, in behalf of the respondents, in the Court of Appeals of the state of New York, January 10, 1862

The Parish will case, argument of John K. Porter, in behalf of the respondents, in the Court of Appeals of the state of New York, January 10, 1862

John K. Porter

1862

In the Court of Appeals, James P. Kernochan, individually and as executor and trustee and others plaintiffs and respondents, against the New York Elevated Railroad Company and the Manhattan Railway Company, defendants and appellants, no. 464

In the Court of Appeals, James P. Kernochan, individually and as executor and trustee and others plaintiffs and respondents, against the New York Elevated Railroad Company and the Manhattan Railway Company, defendants and appellants, no. 464

James P. Kernochan

1890